Work styles assessment

How you work with others

Four colleagues work together at a wooden table in a bright studio, with one pointing, two laughing, and another arranging papers.

You see which of four work styles leads for you, what feels reasonable under pressure, and how the same behavior may land on someone working differently. You learn where friction starts with colleagues and how to work with the other three styles.

Free interpretation of your answers when you sign in

The full report is $20.

100% money-back guaranteeNot happy with your full report? Ask for a refund within 30 days.

Step 1 of 4

Describe yourself as you are now, not as you think you should be or hope to become.

  1. Statement 1: You keep things tidy.

  2. Statement 2: You have a strong personality.

  3. Statement 3: You make friends easily.

  4. Statement 4: You believe you’re better than others.

  5. Statement 5: Messy people don’t bother you.

  6. Statement 6: You lack the talent for influencing people.

  7. Statement 7: You’re hard to get to know.

  8. Statement 8: You hate to seem pushy.

  9. Statement 9: You want everything to be just right.

  10. Statement 10: You know how to captivate people.

What decades of research reveal

These findings come from published research on personality traits. They describe patterns across large groups, not predictions about what will happen to any one person.

  • Three equal square windows line a pale wall, each framing one distant blue hill, with navy, amber, and soft violet frames.

    Traits predicted life outcomes as well as family money

    Personality traits predicted how long people lived, whether marriages ended, and what work people ended up doing about as well as family money and cognitive ability did.

    Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi & Goldberg (2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(4), 313–345.

  • Five differently colored cloth squares lie in a row, joined by one amber thread stitched through all five.

    Across five occupations, conscientiousness predicted performance

    Conscientiousness, which covers planning ahead, staying organized, and finishing what you start, predicted job performance across five kinds of work, while extraversion related to it in managing and sales.

    Barrick & Mount (1991). Personnel Psychology 44(1), 1–26.

  • Viewed from above, a pale blue water surface has a tiny gray pebble at center and one faint ripple ring.

    Higher conscientiousness went with slightly longer life

    Across 20 long-term studies, the correlation between conscientiousness and how long people lived was real but small, at 0.11. Persistence and being organized were the strongest parts of the trait.

    Kern & Friedman (2008). Health Psychology 27(5), 505–512.

  • Matching table lamps, one blue and one amber, flank an open book with blank pages, casting equal pools of light across it.

    Conscientiousness added as much as intelligence

    Across studies of more than 70,000 students, conscientiousness added as much as intelligence to predicting later academic performance after earlier school results were accounted for.

    Poropat (2009). Psychological Bulletin 135(2), 322–338.

Which style leads for you?

Everyone uses all four styles, and your result shows which one leads along with the blend across all four. Calling these published scales Initiator, Host, Moderator, and Planner is our own reading of what they describe.

A workshop bench holds a large paper sheet weighted by stones, a wooden ruler, a jar of pencils, and a stool.
  • Initiator

    Takes the lead, speaks up early, and pushes ideas and decisions into motion.

    From the Assertiveness scale

  • Host

    Brings warmth and energy to working relationships, helping people feel welcome and involved.

    From the Enthusiasm scale

  • Moderator

    Cooperates, respects boundaries and authority, and avoids pressing others too hard.

    From the Politeness scale

  • Planner

    Creates order, follows plans, and keeps rules and details from slipping through.

    From the Orderliness scale

What does this assessment measure?

  1. 40 statements

    Ratings use the scale from Very inaccurate to Very accurate, 10 at a time

  2. 4 scales

    • Assertiveness
    • Enthusiasm
    • Politeness
    • Orderliness
  3. 4 work styles

    • Initiator
    • Host
    • Moderator
    • Planner

    One style leads, and you use all four

  4. 480 adults

    Eugene and Springfield, Oregon, community sample, answered by mail from 1994 to 2002

A desk viewed from above holds an open blank notebook, a pen, coffee, reading glasses, and a small potted plant.

The Work styles assessment uses 40 short statements from the public-domain International Personality Item Pool. Together, the statements form four published scales described by DeYoung, Quilty and Peterson in 2007: Assertiveness, Enthusiasm, Politeness, and Orderliness. You answer each statement from Very inaccurate to Very accurate, and your result names a leading style while showing how all four blend. Grouping the scales into Initiator, Host, Moderator, and Planner is our own reading.

Each score is compared with the answers of 480 adults from the Eugene-Springfield community sample in Oregon. The group’s own answers give the group’s average and spread, so you can see whether each score is close to, above, or below the group’s average.

Why take it here?

  • The view from outside

    Your report shows how each of the other three styles may experience your way of working, so a colleague’s reaction can make sense without making either of you the problem.

  • When work gets hard

    Your report names the habits you bring to pressure and disagreement, including the response that feels reasonable from inside but can make collaboration harder from the other side.

  • Work across differences

    You get specific ways to frame a request, share a decision, or handle disagreement with each of the other three styles, grounded in how that style may read the same moment.

  • No downside

    Read the full report before deciding whether it was worth the purchase. Within 30 days of buying it, you can receive all your money back without giving a reason.

Sample report

What the full report shows about you

The paintings, sections, and reading times here come from a made-up person’s report. Your report would be written from your own answers.

  • Your blend

    How you work, lead, take direction, and handle pressure and disagreement.

    • How you work
    • How you lead and are led
    • Pressure and conflict at work

    about 3 min

  • Other people

    What each work style needs from you, and what people with a different style may misread.

    • Working well with each style
    • How your style may come across

    about 3 min

  • Your four scales

    The trade-off in each style you use, and how it lands with colleagues who work another way.

    • Planner
    • Moderator
    • Host
    • Initiator

    about 16 min

Common questions

Where do these four styles come from?

The questions come from four published scales: Assertiveness, Enthusiasm, Politeness, and Orderliness, developed from the International Personality Item Pool and described by DeYoung, Quilty and Peterson in 2007. The idea of looking at work through outspoken or measured and task or people sides is familiar, but our grouping of these scales, our four names, and our descriptions are our own reading. No study has tested our grouping. The paper found that Assertiveness and Politeness tend to pull in opposite directions, which is why they sit opposite each other on our map.

Who is my score compared with?

Your scores are compared with 480 adults from a community sample in Eugene and Springfield, Oregon, who answered these statements by mail between 1994 and 2002. The group’s public answers give each scale’s average, the stretch close to that average within half a standard deviation, and the percentile. A score is close to the group’s average when it falls within that stretch, and above or below when it falls farther away. Our statements say “you” and use a five-point accuracy scale. Three of the forty statements were never asked of the group in these words, one each for Assertiveness, Enthusiasm, and Politeness, so those three scales use the other nine statements for scoring and comparison, including the score out of 5, and each of those three statements is still asked. The averages the 2007 paper by DeYoung, Quilty, and Peterson published for this same community sample match the group’s within 0.05.

Can I use this for hiring?

No. Nothing here was built or checked for choosing, promoting, or screening out people. The assessment also measures no ability, intelligence, or employability.

What happens to my answers?

We keep your personal information private and never sell it, while anything that identifies you goes only to the companies needed to run the site and take a payment. To delete your account and everything saved in it, email us at hello@nomigram.com from the account’s own address.

Read the privacy page

How do these assessments compare with other sites?

The four scales behind Nomigram’s Work styles assessment come from four of the ten aspects in the Big Five Aspect Scales by Colin DeYoung and colleagues, published in 2007. They are Assertiveness, Enthusiasm, Politeness, and Orderliness. The four work styles are Nomigram’s own way of organizing these scales, so the style names and descriptions belong to this assessment rather than to the source scales.

Nomigram is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by the Myers & Briggs Foundation, The Myers-Briggs Company or NERIS Analytics Limited, and the names are used here only to explain how our assessments relate to them. MBTI, Myers-Briggs and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Myers & Briggs Foundation, Inc. in the United States and other countries. 16Personalities is a trademark of NERIS Analytics Limited.