Types / Personality facets / Fair dealing
A facet inside Agreeableness
How strongly you avoid using, cheating or exploiting people to get ahead.
Whether you avoid using, cheating, exploiting, or blocking others to get ahead. The lower end is more willing to bend fairness when it serves your interests.
This is one scale with two ends, not two camps. Most people land somewhere between them, and neither end is better. The labels describe different ways of answering the statements.
People toward this end may put personal gain ahead of equal treatment when the opportunity is available. They can use a loophole, withhold useful information, or press an uneven bargain when doing so serves their own interests.
People toward this end keep other people’s rights in view when pursuing an outcome. They tend to share credit, follow the same rules they expect from others, and avoid winning through a hidden disadvantage. That standard builds confidence, but it can make them hesitate when bending a rule would seem harmless or efficient.
Agreeableness is the average of six facets, and Fair dealing is one part of it. Someone can land differently on each of the six scales, so the broad result doesn’t tell the whole story.
How readily you believe that other people are honest and mean well.
How strongly you avoid using, cheating or exploiting people to get ahead.
How naturally you notice others’ needs and make time to help them.
How much you avoid fights, insults, retaliation and escalating disagreements.
How much you avoid seeing yourself as better than others or boasting.
How strongly you respond to people who are struggling or worse off.
Answer 120 short statements for a reading across all 30 facets, with each scale explained in plain English.
No. Each end comes with something that helps and something that gets in the way. Some scale names sound like faults in everyday English, but an end label describes what the statements asked about, not a grade.
It happens often, and it’s the reason these 30 facets exist. A broad score is an average of six parts, so one part can point the other way. Nothing is wrong when a facet and its broad trait don’t match perfectly.
A score is compared with 320,128 U.S. adults who answered the original statements online during the roughly 12 years before 2014. Their published average and spread provide a typical range for the facet, showing how the score compares with that group.
