Types / Personality facets / Love of ideas

A facet inside Openness

Love of ideas

How much you enjoy abstract, theoretical or philosophical questions and discussion.

What this facet measures

Three open books and two cups surround a coffee pot on a table, with two chairs pulled close together.

Your interest in abstract, theoretical, philosophical, and challenging discussion. The lower end prefers concrete and practical subjects.

The two ends

This is one scale with two ends, not two camps. Most people land somewhere between them, and neither end is better. The labels describe different ways of answering the statements.

Prefers the concrete

Someone toward this end usually wants an explanation to become useful quickly. They may prefer instructions, examples, and a clear decision over a long discussion about principles or possibilities. That practicality helps turn information into action, though it can leave little patience for questions whose value appears only after a long conversation.

Enjoys big questions

Someone toward this end enjoys following a question past its first answer. They may compare principles, test assumptions, and connect a small decision with a larger picture. That depth can reveal options others miss, though discussion may continue after the practical choice is already clear.

See where all 30 land

Answer 120 short statements for a reading across all 30 facets, with each scale explained in plain English.

Questions

Is a low score a bad score?

No. Each end comes with something that helps and something that gets in the way. Some scale names sound like faults in everyday English, but an end label describes what the statements asked about, not a grade.

What if this part disagrees with its trait?

It happens often, and it’s the reason these 30 facets exist. A broad score is an average of six parts, so one part can point the other way. Nothing is wrong when a facet and its broad trait don’t match perfectly.

Who is this score compared with?

A score is compared with 320,128 U.S. adults who answered the original statements online during the roughly 12 years before 2014. Their published average and spread provide a typical range for the facet, showing how the score compares with that group.