People lower on this trait tend to ask what an idea changes in practice. They may prefer clear evidence, familiar methods, and decisions grounded in what can be observed rather than in what might someday be possible. A clever proposal that creates new problems will not impress them for long, and they do not need to reinvent dinner, a workflow, or a tradition simply to prove they can.
The strength here is continuity: while others chase the next new thing, they may keep a dependable process running and notice the practical details that novelty obscures. The cost is that useful alternatives can arrive wearing the clothes of inconvenience. A method that has worked before is not automatically the best method for a changed situation. Making room for small, low-risk experiments can preserve practicality without turning it into rigidity.